When someone misinterprets an IETF RFC, it can have devastating security implications. So, in recent years, RFC authors have demonstrated a tendency to err on the side of overcommunicating security risks. However, this is a delicate balance to strike: If you go too far, you risk confusing or scaring the reader. This is especially risky since RFCs are often read by non-engineers, making the specter of science communication difficulty continue to haunt us. With all that in mind, several people have asked me in recent weeks for my thoughts on a blog post published earlier this month titled, MLS: The Naked King of End-to-End Encryption. So let’s get into that.